Skip to content
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

FFLGuard

#1 Firearms Compliance Program in the Country

  • How It Works
    • Are You HOT or COLD?
    • The ABC’s of FFLGuard
    • Law Plus Guidelines (LPGs)
    • Find Your FFLGuard Plan
  • What We Offer
    • On Demand Advice
    • New ATF Inspection Outcomes
    • ATF Lawyers
    • Program Services
    • Program Plans
      • Lite Plan
      • Standard Plan
      • Professional Plan
      • Elite Plan
      • Premium Plan
      • Premium PLUS Plan
      • Corporate Plan
      • Manufacturer
      • Wholesaler / Distributor
      • Executive
    • Add-On Yearly Service Plans
      • Operational Security (OpSec)
      • National Firearms Act (NFA)
      • California Yearly Service Plan (CA-YSP)
        • California Magazine Ban 2025: What FFLs Need to Know
      • Destructive Devices & Explosives Yearly Service Plan
      • Import/Export (I/E-YSP)
    • Additional Services
      • FreshStart
      • Establish an FFL Business
        • LaunchPad
        • JumpStart
      • QuickAudit
      • RecordSentinal
      • SiteVisit
      • DeepDIVe
      • Onsite & Online Training
      • Custom Solutions & Services
    • Travel Fees, Costs, & Expenses
    • Firearms Diagnostics Institute
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the Team
      • Lauren Chiafullo, CEO
      • Bryan Chiafullo
      • Alexis Tunell
    • National Coordinating Counsel
    • Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
      • Michael Fronczak
      • Michael Bouchard
      • Kim Pritula
      • Hank Yacek
    • Attorney Advisory Group
  • FAQs, Testimonials, & Resources
    • State-by-State FFL Guides
      • How to Obtain an FFL in Florida
      • How to Get an FFL in Ohio
      • How to Get an FFL in Michigan: A Complete Guide for New Applicants
      • How to Get an FFL in California
      • How to Get a Federal Firearms License (FFL) in Texas
      • How to Get Your FFL in Utah
      • How to Get Your FFL in Illinois
      • How to Get Your FFL in Georgia
      • How to Get Your FFL in Pennsylvania
      • How to Get Your FFL in Maryland
      • How to Get Your FFL in Massachusetts
    • Testimonials
    • FFLGuard – FFL’s FAQs
    • FFLGuard Terms & Conditions
    • Blog and FFL Resources
      • Class 2 SOT Guide for FFL Manufacturers
      • What All FFLs Should Know About ATF Compliance
      • Class 3 Firearms License: Complete Guide to Class 3 SOT for FFLs
      • An FFL’s Complete Guide to the SOT License
      • ATF Form 4473 Compliance Support
      • Firearms Eligibility Check Legal Guidance for FFLs
      • ATF Questions and Answers
      • FFL Types
        • Type 07 FFL Requirements
        • Type 03 FFL Requirements
      • FFL Zoning Requirements: What Every Applicant Needs to Know
  • Login
FFLGuard Breaking News! ​ 🚨 ​ ATF Hits Reverse: eZ Check Rule Withdrawn

FFLGuard Breaking News! ​ 🚨 ​ ATF Hits Reverse: eZ Check Rule Withdrawn

posted on July 2, 2026

Breaking News: ATF withdraws eZ Check rule; certified FFL copies are still required
Breaking News

ATF Hits Reverse: eZ Check Rule Withdrawn After Commenters Request Changes

Certified FFL copies are still required—and any revised proposal must return through the full notice-and-comment process.
Filed: July 2, 2026 Publication: July 6, 2026 Former effective date: August 4, 2026

Well, that was quick.

ATF has officially withdrawn its May 6, 2026 direct final rule that would have allowed Federal Firearms Licensees to use ATF’s online FFL eZ Check system as an alternative to obtaining a certified copy of the receiving licensee’s FFL before completing certain FFL-to-FFL transfers.

The rule was scheduled to take effect on August 4, 2026. It will not.

ATF’s Official Explanation

ATF says it received feedback from multiple commenters requesting changes, including the National Shooting Sports Foundation and Giffords. Because those comments sought substantive revisions, any revised version must be reissued as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and opened for public comment.

ATF is also reviewing the comments it received.

Why Did ATF Withdraw the Rule?

A direct final rule is designed for changes that an agency expects will not generate significant adverse comment. Once commenters requested substantive revisions, ATF could not simply modify the language behind the curtain and let the rule take effect.

To move forward with a revised version, ATF must use the traditional rulemaking process: publish an NPRM, open a new public-comment period, review the comments, and then determine whether to issue a final rule.

Translation The eZ Check concept may return, but it has to come back through the front door—with notice, public comment, agency review, and a final rule.

What Would the Withdrawn Rule Have Changed?

The May 6 direct final rule would have amended 27 C.F.R. Part 478 in two important ways:

1

eZ Check as an Alternative

It would have allowed a transferring FFL to verify the receiving licensee through ATF’s FFL eZ Check system instead of obtaining a certified copy of the transferee’s license.

2

Multi-License Transfers

It would have changed verification procedures for certain transfers involving licensees within the same multi-licensed business organization.

3

August 4 Effective Date

Neither change will take effect on August 4. The current regulation remains in place.

What Does This Mean for FFLs Right Now?

Nothing changes.

FFLs must continue following the existing requirements under 27 C.F.R. § 478.94. That generally means obtaining the required certified copy of the receiving licensee’s FFL before transferring or shipping firearms, unless a currently existing regulatory exception applies.

FFL eZ Check remains a useful tool for validating license information, including whether the license number is valid, whether the license is current, and whether the licensed premises information matches what the receiving FFL provided.

No certified FFL copy? No shipment.

Do not change your procedures based on the withdrawn rule. Do not rely on an old vendor announcement, software update, social-media post, or employee recollection suggesting that eZ Check alone is sufficient.

The August 4 shortcut has officially left the building.

Could the Rule Come Back?

Yes—but not automatically and not overnight.

ATF may publish a revised NPRM addressing the concerns raised by commenters. That proposal would need to be published, opened for public comment, reviewed by the agency, and followed by a final rule before any new requirements or alternatives could take effect.

Until that process is complete, the current regulation remains the rulebook.

The FFLGuard Bottom Line

ATF attempted to modernize the FFL-to-FFL verification process. Commenters from different sides of the firearms-policy universe requested changes, forcing ATF to withdraw the direct final rule and reconsider the proposal through the traditional notice-and-comment process.

Keep obtaining certified FFL copies. Keep using eZ Check as a verification tool. Do not treat eZ Check as a substitute for the license copy.

Read the Official Notice

Review ATF’s withdrawal notice and keep your written transfer procedures aligned with the regulation currently in effect.

Read the Federal Register Notice Contact FFLGuard
This article provides general information and is not individualized legal advice. FFLGuard clients should submit transaction-specific questions through the HelpDesk.

Filed Under: News, Rulings Tagged With: ATF, atf regulatory package, ATF Ruling, ez check

Footer CTA

Contact

  • Email
  • Phone

Social

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Contact Us
  • Login
  • Policies

Copyright © 2026 · FFLGuard · All Rights Reserved.