Skip to content
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

FFLGuard

#1 Firearms Compliance Program in the Country

  • How It Works
    • Are You HOT or COLD?
    • The ABC’s of FFLGuard
    • Law Plus Guidelines (LPGs)
    • Find Your FFLGuard Plan
  • What We Offer
    • On Demand Advice
    • New ATF Inspection Outcomes
    • ATF Lawyers
    • Program Services
    • Program Plans
      • Lite Plan
      • Standard Plan
      • Professional Plan
      • Elite Plan
      • Premium Plan
      • Premium PLUS Plan
      • Corporate Plan
      • Manufacturer
      • Wholesaler / Distributor
      • Executive
    • Add-On Yearly Service Plans
      • Operational Security (OpSec)
      • National Firearms Act (NFA)
      • California Yearly Service Plan (CA-YSP)
        • California Magazine Ban 2025: What FFLs Need to Know
      • Destructive Devices & Explosives Yearly Service Plan
      • Import/Export (I/E-YSP)
    • Additional Services
      • FreshStart
      • Establish an FFL Business
        • LaunchPad
        • JumpStart
      • QuickAudit
      • RecordSentinal
      • SiteVisit
      • DeepDIVe
      • Onsite & Online Training
      • Custom Solutions & Services
    • Travel Fees, Costs, & Expenses
    • Firearms Diagnostics Institute
  • Who We Are
    • Meet the Team
      • Lauren Chiafullo, CEO
      • Bryan Chiafullo
      • Alexis Tunell
    • National Coordinating Counsel
    • Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
      • Michael Fronczak
      • Michael Bouchard
      • Kim Pritula
      • Hank Yacek
    • Attorney Advisory Group
  • FAQs, Testimonials, & Resources
    • State-by-State FFL Guides
      • How to Obtain an FFL in Florida
      • How to Get an FFL in Ohio
      • How to Get an FFL in Michigan: A Complete Guide for New Applicants
      • How to Get an FFL in California
      • How to Get a Federal Firearms License (FFL) in Texas
      • How to Get Your FFL in Utah
      • How to Get Your FFL in Illinois
      • How to Get Your FFL in Georgia
      • How to Get Your FFL in Pennsylvania
      • How to Get Your FFL in Maryland
      • How to Get Your FFL in Massachusetts
    • Testimonials
    • FFLGuard – FFL’s FAQs
    • FFLGuard Terms & Conditions
    • Blog and FFL Resources
      • Class 2 SOT Guide for FFL Manufacturers
      • What All FFLs Should Know About ATF Compliance
      • Class 3 Firearms License: Complete Guide to Class 3 SOT for FFLs
      • An FFL’s Complete Guide to the SOT License
      • ATF Form 4473 Compliance Support
      • Firearms Eligibility Check Legal Guidance for FFLs
      • ATF Questions and Answers
      • FFL Types
        • Type 07 FFL Requirements
        • Type 03 FFL Requirements
      • FFL Zoning Requirements: What Every Applicant Needs to Know
  • Login
Breaking News: ATF Rescinds 2011 Medical-Marijuana Open Letter

Breaking News: ATF Rescinds 2011 Medical-Marijuana Open Letter

posted on September 4, 2026

September 4, 2026

Breaking News: ATF Rescinds 2011 Medical-Marijuana Open Letter

Jurisdiction: Federal
Status: NEW / CONFIRMED GUIDANCE RESCISSION
Effective Date: Not identified by ATF

There is now one very important word stamped across ATF’s 2011 Medical-Marijuana Open Letter:

RESCINDED.

On September 21, 2011, ATF instructed Federal Firearms Licensees that possession of a state-issued medical-marijuana card, by itself, provided “reasonable cause to believe” a prospective transferee was an unlawful user of a controlled substance. Under that guidance, an FFL was instructed to refuse the transfer—even when the buyer answered “No” to the applicable drug-use question on ATF Form 4473.

ATF’s official copy of that letter is now expressly marked “RESCINDED.”

What This Means for FFLs

The prior categorical rule of thumb—medical-marijuana card equals automatic reasonable cause to deny—should no longer be treated as operative ATF guidance.

A medical-marijuana card, standing alone, should not be used as an automatic denial mechanism based on the rescinded letter.

That is the headline. Now for the part where everyone keeps their compliance hat firmly attached.

What Has Not Changed

The rescission does not erase 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(d)(3) or 922(g)(3). Federal law continues to address persons who are unlawful users of or addicted to controlled substances, and an FFL still may not transfer a firearm or ammunition when the FFL knows or has reasonable cause to believe the recipient is legally prohibited.

ATF’s current regulation requires evidence of sufficiently regular and recent unlawful use demonstrating ongoing conduct. It expressly states that isolated, sporadic or discontinued use does not qualify as unlawful current use.

The Supreme Court’s June 18, 2026 decision in United States v. Hemani also held that the government’s prosecution of Hemani under § 922(g)(3)’s unlawful-user provision violated the Second Amendment under the facts presented. The decision was as-applied; it did not delete § 922(g)(3), and the Court expressly declined to decide the separate prohibition involving persons who are “addicted to” a controlled substance.

What FFLs Should Do Now

FFLs should:

  • Remove any SOP, training material, counter guide or software instruction that treats possession of a medical-marijuana card alone as an automatic basis for denial under the 2011 ATF letter.

  • Continue completing ATF Form 4473 and conducting the required NICS or state point-of-contact background check.

  • Distinguish the mere possession of a medical-marijuana card from transaction-specific evidence of actual current unlawful use, addiction, impairment, admissions or other facts that may create reasonable cause to believe the person is prohibited.

  • Avoid inventing new questions, interrogations or homemade marijuana questionnaires. Compliance is not improved by freelancing at the gun counter.

  • Contact the FFLGuard HelpDesk before completing a transaction when the available facts create uncertainty regarding the buyer’s eligibility.

The FFLGuard Bottom Line

The letter has been rescinded. The statutes have not.

FFLs should stop using a medical-marijuana card as a categorical shortcut and return to a transaction-specific analysis based on current law, current regulations and the actual facts presented.

FFLGuard identified the rescission on September 4, 2026. ATF has not stated when the rescission became effective and has not identified replacement marijuana-specific dealer guidance. Until ATF provides additional information, this development should be characterized as a confirmed substantive guidance change with an undetermined rescission date.

Official Sources

  • ATF — Rescinded 2011 Medical-Marijuana Open Letter

  • Current 27 C.F.R. § 478.11

  • U.S. Supreme Court — United States v. Hemani

  • 18 U.S.C. § 922

Stay sharp. Stay current. And when ATF retires a 15-year-old instruction without announcing when it happened, keep the FFLGuard HelpDesk close.

The FFLGuard Team

Filed Under: News

Footer CTA

Contact

  • Email
  • Phone

Social

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Contact Us
  • Login
  • Policies

Copyright © 2026 · FFLGuard · All Rights Reserved.