• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

FFLGuard

#1 Firearms Compliance Program in the Country

  • How It Works
    • Are You HOT or COLD?
    • Law Plus Guidelines (LPGs)
  • What We Offer
    • Basic Services
    • Service Levels
      • QuickConsult
      • SimpleSupport
      • SimpleSupport PLUS
      • Lite
      • Standard
      • Professional
      • Elite
      • Premium
      • PremiumPLUS
      • Corporate
      • Manufacturer
      • Wholesaler/Distributor
      • Executive
    • Yearly Service Plans
      • Operational Security (OpSec)
      • National Firearms Act (NFA)
      • California Yearly Service Plan (CA-YSP)
      • Import/Export (I/E-YSP)
    • Additional Services
      • FreshStart
      • JumpStart
      • RecordSentinal
      • SiteVisit
      • DeepDIVe
      • OnSite & OnLine Training
    • Travel Fees, Costs, & Expenses
    • Firearms Diagnostics Institute
    • FFLGuard Terms & Conditions
  • Who We Are
    • National Coordinating Counsel
    • Subject Matter Experts
      • Michael Fronczak
      • Michael Bouchard
      • Mark Finnerty
      • Rick Vasquez
      • Scot Thomasson
      • Jim Zammillo
    • Attorney Advisory Group
    • Client Relations Team
  • FAQs & Testimonials
    • FAQs
    • Testimonials
    • The ABC’s of FFLGuard
  • Login

Legality of Nighthawk Tomahawk

posted on January 18, 2019

Q: Follow-up to Case 15151: Is the reason is Nighthawk is considered a “weapon of mass death and destruction” because it was originally a Remington shotgun that has been customized as opposed to the TAC 14 which has the same barrel specifications but was manufactured that way?

View the answer to this and thousands of other questions in our client-only Support Center.

View Answer

Footer CTA

Contact

  • Email
  • Phone

Social

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Service Plans
  • Contact FFLGuard
  • Login

Copyright © 2022 · FFLGuard · All Rights Reserved.